AGs in the News: Environment
Oklahoma, West Virginia Attorneys General Testify Before U.S. Senate to Oppose EPA’s Proposed Clean Power Plan (May 5, 2015)
On May 5, 2015, the Attorneys General of Oklahoma and West Virginia testified before a U.S. Senate committee in opposition to the EPA’s proposed Clean Power Plan. The Attorneys General stated that the plan would cause great economic harm to their states and was an illegal attempt to increase federal authority over state energy production.
Vermont Attorney General, Ski Resort Settle Case Alleging the Resort Violated State Land Use and Environmental Permitting Laws (May 5, 2015)
In May 2015, the Vermont Attorney General announced that it reached a settlement with a private ski resort to settle a case alleging that the resort failed to obtain the necessary permits to develop and construct the resort. The resort will pay $205,000 in civil penalties.
Oklahoma Attorney General, Governor Disagree Over Support for State Legislation Requiring Oklahoma to Submit Plan to Comply with EPA’s Proposed Clean Power Plan (May 2, 2015)
On May 2, 2015, the Oklahoma Attorney General stated he disagreed with the Governor’s decision to veto a bill that would require the state to submit a state implementation plan to comply with federal regulations, including the EPA’s proposed Clean Power Plan rule. The Attorney General said that even though he thought the EPA’s proposal was illegal, the bill was reasonable because it “ensured Oklahoma would not be forced to submit a compliance plan to the EPA that violated state, or federal law.”
Delaware Attorney General’s Office Prevails in Lawsuit Challenging EPA Rule Permitting Emission Control Exemption for Backup Generators (May 1, 2015)
On May 1, 2015, the D.C. Circuit ruled in favor of Delaware in a lawsuit challenging the EPA’s decision to allow backup generators to run for up to 100 hours per year without installing emission controls.
California Attorney General Announces Cement Plant to Pay $7.5M to Settle Lawsuit Alleging the Plant Dumped Toxic Waste into Creek Leading to San Francisco Bay (April 30, 2015)
In April 2015, the California Attorney General announced that a cement plant agreed to pay $7.5 million to settle a federal lawsuit alleging that company violated the Clean Water Act by illegally dumping millions of gallons of water polluted with toxic metals into Permanente Creek, which leads to San Francisco Bay.
Arkansas Attorney General, Federal Government Reach $5 Million Settlement with Exxon to Resolve Lawsuit Stemming from 2013 Crude Oil Spill (April 26, 2015)
In April 2015, the Attorney General of Arkansas announced that the state, federal government, and ExxonMobil had reached a $5 million settlement to resolve claims from a 2013 oil spill in Mayflower, Arkansas. ExxonMobil will pay $3.19 million in federal civil penalties, $1 million in state penalties, $600,000 for water quality-based environmental projects, and $280,000 in attorneys’ fees.
New York Attorney General Issues Report About Water Pollution Caused by Microbeads Discharged into Great Lakes, Finger Lakes (April 20, 2015)
In April 2015, the New York Attorney General issued a report that concludes microbeads from personal care products are traveling from wastewater plants into state waters and polluting these waters. The Attorney General proposed legislation to address this issue last year.
Washington Attorney General Secures Criminal Conviction Against Defendant for Illegally Attempting to Fill, Alter Course of River (April 19, 2015)
In April 2015, the Washington Attorney General secured a criminal conviction, after a jury trial, of a defendant who illegally attempted to fill and redirect the Tahuya River. The defendant will serve 30 days in jail on each count, pay $8,143 in fines, and serve two years on probation.
West Virginia Attorney General Publishes Op-Ed Opposing EPA’s Proposed Clean Power Plan, Argues the Plan Is Illegal, Harmful to State and Citizens (April 16, 2015)
In April 2015, West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrissey issued an editorial, arguing that the EPA’s proposed rule, which requires states to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 30% by 2030, is harmful to the states and also argues that it is illegal.
Court Hears Challenge Brought by 15 States to EPA Proposed Clean Power Plan Rule (April 16, 2015)
In April 2015, the D.C. Circuit heard arguments in two cases against the EPA’s proposed Clean Power Plan rule. 15 states brought one of the cases, and the other was brought by energy industry groups. The cases are State of West Virginia v. EPA and In re: Murray Energy Corp.
New Jersey Attorney General Files Proposed Settlement Agreement with Exxon for $225 Million for Pollution at Oil Refineries (April 15, 2015)
In April 2015, the New Jersey Attorney General asked a court to approve a $225 million settlement between the state and Exxon to resolve claims of environmental harm from pollution at two oil refinery sites. The state previously requested $8.9 billion in damages.
Oregon Attorney General Defends State In Lawsuit Seeking to Require State to Undertake More Action Against Climate Change (April 2015)
In April 2015, the Oregon Attorney General’s Office defended the state in a case seeking to require Oregon to increase efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change. The suit is one of many that attorneys general are currently involved in. These suits have been filed in nearly every state, supported by Our Children’s Trust, as a coordinated effort to force governments to increase efforts to combat climate change.
Maryland Attorney General Files Comments Opposing Oil and Gas Drilling Off Atlantic Coast, Citing Potential for Harm to Maryland Beaches and Chesapeake Bay (March 30, 2015)
In March 2015, the Maryland Attorney General filed comments with the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management in opposition to a proposal to permit oil and gas drilling off the Atlantic Coast. The Attorney General’s comments cited the potential for environmental harm to the state’s beaches and the Chesapeake Bay area.
Nineteen Attorneys General Send Letter to EPA Stating Proposed Rules to Reduce Emissions from Power Plants Be Withdrawn (March 25, 2015)
On Mar. 25, 2015, nineteen attorneys general wrote to EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy, stating that because the EPA missed a deadline in adopting new rules requiring power plants to reduce emissions, the EPA should withdraw the proposed rules.
North Carolina Attorney General Defends Environmental Management Commission Before State Supreme Court In Appeal Over Groundwater Contamination from Energy Company (March 16, 2015)
In March 2015, the North Carolina Attorney General’s Office represented the state Environmental Management Commission before the state Supreme Court. Environmental groups alleged that Duke Energy was not cleaning up coal ash that was polluting the groundwater in a timely manner. The state, which sued Duke last year over groundwater pollution, sided with Duke on appeal.
Missouri Attorney General, Chris Koster Reaches Settlement With Tyson Foods Over Environmental Issues (January 20, 2015)
In May 2014, a Tyson Foods facility discharged wastewater from the company's Aurora facility into the city of Monett's sewer system. The discharge contained a highly acidic animal feed supplement, which caused the city's biological wastewater treatment system to fail. Tyson Foods will pay a total of $540,000 in penalties, damages and environmental improvements.
Attorney General Ferguson Files Unlawful Dumping Charges Against Seattle Fuel Tank Processor (January 14, 2015)
Attorney General Bob Ferguson announced that his office filed charges against the owner of a Seattle fuel tank processing facility for allegedly dumping oil and sludge into the public sewer system. Thomas Wise is charged with first-degree defrauding a public utility, unlawful dumping of solid waste without a permit and making a false or misleading statement to a public servant.
Alaska Attorney General, Oil Company Reach $700,000 Settlement in Case Over Damage from Fuel Spill (January 6, 2015)
In January 2015, the Alaska Attorney General announced that it reached a settlement with Aleut Enterprises LLC to resolve claims from a 2010 fuel spill. The company will pay $700,000 to cover fines and improved compliance measures.
State Attorneys General File Comments in Support and Opposition to EPA’s Proposed Clean Power Plan (December 3, 2014)
Attorneys General from around the nation submitted comments both supporting and opposing the EPA’s proposed rules for reducing carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. Some states argued that the emission program would be the most “reliable way to achieve emission reductions,” while others argued that the rule contained “numerous legal defects.”
California Attorney General Challenges Plans to Allow Rail Transport of Crude Oil to Refinery in Northern California (October 8, 2014)
In October 2014, the California Attorney General challenged the City of Benicia’s decision to allow Valero Refining Company to build a crude oil transfer station to transport the oil through Northern California for processing. The Attorney General argued that the environmental impact study “fails to properly account for many of the project’s potentially significant impacts.”
New York Attorney General, Citing Federal Inaction, Calls for Improved Efforts to Combat Climate Change at Statewide Level (September 2, 2014)
In a September 2014 speech at Pace University, the New York Attorney General urged state lawmakers to continue and strengthen their efforts to combat climate change at the state level, arguing that state efforts were critical in the absence of federal action on climate change.
Vermont Attorney General Obtains $100,000 Settlement, Order for Dry Cleaner Operator to Pay for Cleanup of Contaminated Sites (August 20, 2014)
In August 2014, the Vermont Attorney General obtained a court order holding a former dry cleaner operator responsible for cleaning up contamination at the site of his business operations. The operator was ordered to pay $100,000 for cleanup costs as part of a settlement agreement.
New Jersey Attorney General Says That State Will Repeal Cap-and-Trade Regulations After Court Rules Administration Improperly Withdrew from Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative Program (May 27, 2014)
In May 2014, the Office of the Attorney General of New Jersey filed documents with the New Jersey Appellate Division, indicating that the State will submit an official proposal to repeal regulations designed to implement a regional cap-and-trade program. This decision comes two months after the court ruled that the State violated the law by attempting to withdraw from the program by posting a notice on the Department of Environmental Protection’s website.
Twenty-One Attorneys General File Amicus Brief To Oppose EPA Plan to Clean Up Chesapeake Bay (February 5, 2014)
In February 2014, attorneys general from twenty-one states signed on to an amicus brief filed with the Third Circuit in a case challenging the EPA’s plan to clean up the Chesapeake Bay.
Attorney General Madigan, Mayor Emanuel File Suit Against Second Pet Coke Site (November 22, 2013)
Attorney General Lisa Madigan and Mayor Rahm Emanuel today filed suit against the owner and operator of a bulk materials storage and handling facility asking that piles of petroleum coke (pet coke) and metallurgical coke (met coke) be removed until proper permits are obtained and to cease all operations that are sending particles into nearby residential areas on Chicago’s southeast side in violation of air pollution and environmental laws, including taking in any new pet coke and met coke.
State to Be Reimbursed $8.05 Million For Cleanup Of Exxonmobil Oil Contamination At Ogdensburg’s Lighthouse Point (November 22, 2013)
ExxonMobil Oil Corporation will reimburse the State of New York $8.05 million for costs incurred by the state in investigating and remediating oil accumulations on Lighthouse Point, on the Oswegatchie and St. Lawrence rivers.
In 2001, petroleum contamination was discovered at the spill site when an investigators encountered contaminated soil on a parcel adjacent to the main terminal. Following the report of the spill, further investigation revealed widespread petroleum contamination in and around the former ExxonMobil main terminal facility and near underground pipelines connecting the terminal to the Oswegatchie River.
New Mexico Attorney General, Ted Turner Ranch, Others Appeal Rules on Copper Mine Pollution (October 10, 2013)
New Mexico Attorney General Gary King and billionaire media mogul Ted Turner went to court Thursday to overturn new state regulations on groundwater pollution by copper mines. Critics say the rules provide mining companies too much leeway to pollute groundwater and violate state law prohibiting water contamination above certain standards. "Ninety percent of New Mexicans rely on groundwater for drinking water and this new rule, if allowed to be implemented, could render our water undrinkable for hundreds of years," said AG King.
AG Sues EPA Over Wood-Burning Devices (October 9, 2013)
Attorneys general from seven states including Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont, New York, Rhode Island, Oregon and Maryland are suing the federal government to begin regulating outdoor wood-burning boilers and to toughen regulations on residential wood-burning devices. The same suit was also filed jointly by the American Lung Association, Environmental Defense Fund, Clean Air Council, and Environment and Human Health Inc.
“The EPA’s regulations simply haven’t kept pace with the proliferation of wood-burning devices or the availability of cleaner-burning units. Smoke from residential wood-burning heaters poses a serious health threat,” said Schneiderman. “This lawsuit aims to force the EPA to comply with the Clean Air Act and provide overdue leadership in requiring new wood heaters to meet stricter pollution standards — an action that will save consumers money, improve local air quality and safeguard public health.”
Attorney general ‘disappointed’ by copper mine water decision (September 11, 2013)
The proposed new rule would let copper mine operations contaminate groundwater without variances, as long as the contamination was contained and fully removed up to state standards before the mine closed. King said, “I am very disappointed by this decision of the Governor’s commission. It threatens the precious supplies of water we drink in New Mexico. Groundwater contamination is a serious public health challenge, and it puts our children and grandchildren’s well-being at risk.”
Pennsylvania Attorney General Files Criminal Charges Against Marcellus Gas Drilling Company (September 10, 2013)
Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane filed charges against XTO Energy Inc., of Indiana, Pa. and a subsidiary of ExxonMobil, for illegally discharging more than 50,000 gallons of toxic wastewater from a Marcellus Shale gas well site in Penn Township, Lycoming County. A grand jury handed down the indictment after the presentation of evidence that showed that a rear discharge valve on a wastewater storage tank was opened and a drain plug removed, causing gas well wastewater to flow out of the storage tank onto the ground. The toxic wastewater flowed into and polluted an unnamed tributary of Sugar Run. As a result of the spill, DEP required more than 3,000 tons of contaminated soil to be excavated and removed from the Marquardt site.
AG Zoeller Raises Awareness of Asian Carp Issue (July 15, 2013)
Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller will take a trip down the Wabash river to raise awareness about the “invasive” Asian carp, which have become a serious environmental issue throughout the country.
Eight Attorneys General Announce AEP Will Pay $8.5 Million, Impose More Stringent Emissions Standards as Part of Consent Decree From 2007 Settlement (February 26, 2013)
In February 2013, eight attorneys general announced that American Electric Power will pay $8.5 million and tighten emissions standards for sulfur dioxide as part of an ongoing settlement first reached between the parties in 2007.
New York Attorney General Successfully Defends State’s Participation in Regional Cap-and-Trade Program (June 14, 2012)
In 2012, the New York Attorney General defended the state’s participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) in a lawsuit arguing that the program imposed an illegal tax on ratepayers. In June 2012, the court dismissed the suit.
11 States Sue EPA to Set Soot Pollution Standards for Air (February 13, 2012)
A coalition of eleven attorneys general have filed a lawsuit in the federal district court of New York after the EPA failed to meet a deadline in October of 2011 setting new soot pollution standards. Soot pollution is also called fine particulate matter pollution and is a result of diesel engines and power plants. EPA last issued standards in 2006 that were deemed too lax following a lawsuit by 17 states in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. The court remanded the standards to the EPA to issue new standards to better protect public health. The states that have filed the current lawsuit include California, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. The case is U.S. v. Jackson, 2-cv-10064, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).
Federal Judge Rules in Favor of North Dakota on EPA Air Pollution Rules (December 23, 2011)
North Dakota Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem announced a US District Court judge ruled in favor of North Dakota and a local power provider on a motion to resolve a dispute between the state and the Environmental Protection Agency on air quality rules. North Dakota argues that the new rules would require two power plants in the state to upgrade to expensive pollution-control technology that might not work. The federal judge held that North Dakota’s findings about the technology were not unreasonable and that the EPA, who had the burden of proof, did not meet their burden for the dispute resolution process. In a statement praising the ruling Stenehjem said, “These issues are about North Dakota's sovereignty, its authority, and its demonstrated commitment to protect its environment and economic well-being.” Stenehjem also said he hoped the ruling would encourage the EPA to adopt North Dakota’s proposal for the power plants.
Iowa AG sues Grain Processor over Pollution (December 1, 2011)
Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller has sued Grain Processing Corp. over alleged violations of state air and water pollution control laws. According to Miller, the company emitted more than the allowable amount of sulfur dioxide and particulate matter, failed to maintain equipment used to prevent excess emissions, failed to get proper construction permits, and failed to comply with notification and reporting requirements. The lawsuit seeks civil penalties for the violations and an injunction requiring the grain processor to comply with state law.
Texas AG Charges Tire Storage Facility over Waste Disposal Violations (November 22, 2011)
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott charged the operator of a tire scrap facility for violating state waste disposal laws. According to Abbott, the operator of the facility failed to get the required permits to burn outdoors and scrap tires, prevent fire outbreaks, and remove the unauthorized tire collection. The charges follow a fire at the facility in early August that burned approximately 22,000 scrap tires. McGraw’s suit seeks a penalty of up to $25,000 per day the facility was in violation of the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act.
DRBC Postpones ‘Fracking’ Vote, New York AG Approves (November 18, 2011)
The Delaware River Basin Commission has indefinitely postponed a meeting that was supposed to take place November 21st to vote on natural gas regulations that would lift the moratorium on hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, in the Delaware River Basin. New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman supported the move saying, “This delay further demonstrates that the proposed regulations for fracking in the Delaware River basin are not ready to see the light of day. Without a full, fair and open review of the potential risks of fracking in the basin, the public will continue to question the federal government's ability to protect public health and environment." Schneiderman has sued the federal government over alleged failures regarding fracking studies. The delay follows an announcement by Delaware Governor Jack Markell, who is a member of the Commission, that he would not support the regulations.
Missouri AG Secures TRO Against Foundry Owners for Water Violations (November 17, 2011)
Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster announced a temporary restraining order against the owners of foundry Didion and Sons. According to Koster, the owners violated several Missouri environmental laws by illegally dumping and storing toxic substances. The owners were allegedly evasive about having their foundry inspected while in the middle of demolishing buildings on the site, prompting state Department of Natural Resource officials to obtain a search warrant, which revealed the alleged violations. In a statement Koster said “Taking care of our environment is a responsibility we all share. This office takes that responsibility seriously and will continue to vigorously enforce the laws governing the use of our natural resources.”
Court Decides Mississippi Lawsuit over BP Funds to be in State Court (November 16, 2011)
A federal district court judge ruled that Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood’s lawsuit against the administrator of BP’s oil spill fund will be heard in state court. This decision follows an earlier move by the fund’s administrator to have the lawsuit heard in federal court. According to Hood’s office, the lawsuit was filed in response to alleged failures on behalf of the BP fund administrator to provide documents regarding Mississippi claims.
Missouri AG sues Bar Owner over Septic Violations (November 13, 2011)
Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster and the Missouri Department of Natural Resources filed suit against the owner of Missouri bar The Upper Deck. According to Koster’s office and the state DNR, the owner violated state clean water laws when he failed to register before operating his septic tank, among other related violations. The suit alleges the owner failed to renew his operating permit, illegally discharged into Missouri waters, failed to follow discharge limits, and failed to submit required annual sludge and discharge monitoring reports. The owner could be fined as much as $10,000 per day for each violation, though a spokeswoman for Koster’s office said the state would likely work with the owner to reduce the fine amount.
New York AG Criticizes Proposed Fracking Regulations (November 8, 2011)
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman took issue with new regulations on hydrofracking proposed by the Delaware River Basin Commission. The proposed rules would permit natural gas companies to collectively drill a maximum of 300 natural gas wells when the moratorium on drilling in the Marcellus Shale of the Delaware River Basin is lifted. Once the limit on wells is reached the Commission would have to vote to allow any additional drilling. According to Schneiderman, the regulations are inadequate given the lack of an environmental impact study. In a statement regarding the lack of an environmental impact study Schneiderman said the "federal government does not have a complete understanding of the health and safety risks fracking poses, even as it stands to open up the Delaware River Basin to thousands of new gas wells.”
Massachusetts AG Fines Distributor for Wetlands Violations (November 7, 2011)
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley announced a settlement with high fructose corn syrup supplier Tate & Lyle Ingredients America LLC over alleged violations of state clean water and wetland laws. According to Coakley, the distributor dumped water used to clean the inside of corn syrup tanker trucks into a culvert behind their plant, which then flowed into a nearby swamp and caused vegetation in the swamp to turn black. Coakley’s office says rinse water caused approximately 12,000 square feet of damage to vegetated wetlands. Under the terms of the agreement Tate & Lyle will pay $105,000 in penalties and restore the damaged wetland.
Missouri AG sues CAFO over Wastewater (November 5, 2011)
Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster filed suit against Charles Cooper LLC, a concentrated animal feeding operation or CAFO, alleging violations of the state’s Clean Water Law. According to Koster, the CAFO polluted a creek by applying wastewater to farm fields. Additionally, Koster alleges the CAFO breached an agreement to correct prior violations and pay a penalty. The suit asks the court to require the CAFO comply with the Clean Water Law, pay the $9,000 suspended from an earlier penalty, and assess a new penalty of up to $10,000 per day per violation.
Texas Fines BP over 2005 Refinery Explosion (November 3, 2011)
Oil giant BP has agreed to pay $50 million in fines to Texas following an explosion at an oil refinery in 2005 that unlawfully released pollutants into the air. According to Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, the fine will settle all state claims against BP over emissions at the refinery. At a news conference Abbott said, "This sends a strong, clear message ... that you don't mess with Texas air quality.” The fine against BP is the largest ever for a violation of the Texas Clean Air Act at a single facility.
North Dakota AG sues Minnesota over State Clean-Air Laws (November 3, 3011)
North Dakota Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem announced the state is suing Minnesota over carbon dioxide emissions restrictions that could affect power sales in North Dakota. In a statement Stenehjem said “It is unfortunate it has come to this. As Minnesota seeks to rebuild its economy, it will need energy. Much of that energy will need to come from sources outside Minnesota. Over the last four years, we in North Dakota have made every effort to convince Minnesota officials to rescind this act.” Stenehjem filed after Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton vetoed a bill that would have overturned the restrictions.
Ohio AG Rules Water Permits were not Issued Legally (November 2, 2011)
Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine determined that permits granted by the state Environmental Protection Agency to Patriot Water Treatment and the City of Warren to process gas and oil well brine were not legal. According to DeWine, the permits issued “did not have a basis in law.” In the ruling DeWine also stated, “The safety of Ohio's water is too important to put at risk as most wastewater treatment plants don't currently have the proper technology for adequately treating fracking fluids." DeWine has asked the Environmental Review Appeals Commission to dismiss Patriot’s appeals and send the permits back to the Ohio EPA director for further action. Ohio EPA says DeWine’s ruling on the permits was a declaration of error on behalf of the EPA and is consistent with their determinations.
Illinois AG Sues over Violations in Train Derailment (October 31, 2011)
Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan filed suit against Iowa Interstate Railroad, Ltd. alleging environmental violations following a train derailment in which ethanol-filled tankers caught fire. According to Illinois authorities, while the fire burned off much of the spilled ethanol an unknown quantity seeped into the soil. There are at least three wells for drinking water in the area around the spill. Madigan’s lawsuit asks the court to order Iowa Interstate completely cleanup the area and pay all costs associated with the cleanup. Additionally, Madigan and Iowa Interstate entered an agreement with the court, which the court granted, requiring Iowa Interstate to work with the state on cleanup while the lawsuit pends, including conducting surveys and reporting test results. In a statement Madigan said, “With an ethanol spill of this magnitude, we must ensure that the proper steps are taken to clean up the area and protect the public’s health and safety during that process.”
Oklahoma AG Warns over EPA Data on Natural Gas Emissions (October 28, 2011)
Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt is warning fellow state Attorneys General over data used by the Environmental Protection Agency to measure emissions from natural gas production. According to Pruitt, the EPA is relying on inaccurate methods to measure methane emissions into the atmosphere from natural gas production. Addressing the data collection methods Pruitt said, “This misstep or deception by the EPA has resulted in new figures that are faulty, unreasonable and based on a distorted understanding of how gas drilling operates.” Pruitt’s letter to other Attorneys General follows a letter he sent to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson earlier this month expressing concerns over the data collection methods.
California AG Sues Bottled-Water Companies over “Biodegradable” Labels (October 27, 2011)
California Attorney General Kamala Harris filed suit against a plastic bottling company and two bottled-water companies over allegations that designating their plastic containers as biodegradable is false and illegal. In California, it is illegal to label plastic food or beverage containers as biodegradable. In a statement Harris said, "Californians are committed to recycling and protecting the environment, but these efforts are undermined by the false and misleading claims these companies make.” Harris’ suit seeks to prohibit sale of the allegedly mislabeled products and up to $2,500 in penalties per violation.
Great Lakes State AGs Petition Supreme Court over Asian Carp Threat (October 26, 2011)
Five states—Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—are petitioning the U.S. Supreme Court to review a case involving the threat of Asian Carp entering the Great Lakes. The states hope to force the Army Corps of Engineers to work faster to study permanently separating the Mississippi River and Great Lakes to prevent Asian Carp invasions. In a news release Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette said, “Time is running out for the Great Lakes and we can’t afford to wait years before the federal government takes action.” The states previously appealed their case to the Supreme Court on a different legal theory but the petition for certiorari was denied.
Court Denies Appeal Request in Texas, Oklahoma Water Case (October 22, 2011)
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied a request from a Texas water district to appeal an earlier decision upholding an Oklahoma law that restricts exporting stream water from the state. The Tarrant Regional Water District in Texas sought to have the courts overturn the Oklahoma law and require the state to allow them to purchase water. In a statement about the decision Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt said that the decision “underscores that the people of Oklahoma should not be mandated through litigation to shape water policy. Water is an important resource that is vital to Oklahomans, and my office will continue to defend our state's interests.”
Seven States File Motion to Intervene for EPA over Cross-State Pollution Rule (October 21, 2011)
Seven states—Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, and the District of Columbia—filed a motion to intervene on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency in the legal challenge over the Cross-State Air Pollution rule. The rule would require some states to significantly reduce emissions of air pollutants that adversely impact pollution levels in downwind states and is being challenged by several states. In a statement Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen said, "While Connecticut has stringent laws controlling sources of air pollution emissions, the same cannot be said of other states. The EPA proposed a rule that controls sources of pollution in other states, which would otherwise blow into our region. We are working to ensure that this rule is not overturned.''
19 States ask Supreme Court to Review Stormwater Runoff Case (October 18, 2011)
Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and attorneys general for 18 other states filed an amicus brief in the case of Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center. The amicus brief was filed in support of Oregon State Forester Doug Decker’s petition for certiorari to the U.S Supreme Court. The brief argues that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit failed to give deference to the Environmental Protection Agency’s interpretation of the Clean Water Act determining that logging roads are not point sources. In a statement about the brief Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi said, “Congress has held that states are the appropriate entities to determine best management practices for protecting our waters and wildlife from stormwater runoff related to timber harvesting. The Ninth Circuit's ruling contradicts more than 30 years of practice and Congress' and the EPA's directives.”
Wisconsin AG Announces Fine for Shoreline Damage (October 13, 2011)
Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen announced that a Wisconsin couple was ordered to pay $99,999 in fines by a judge for shoreline damage. According to Van Hollen, the couple built a stone wall without a permit which damaged more than 10,000 square feet of shoreline and lake bed on the Upper Nashotah Lake. The couple also allegedly dumped large amounts of sand into the lake without a permit. The judge also ordered the couple to buy $5,000 worth of native plants for their property on the lake.
Maryland AG Settles with Steel Mill over Emissions (October 13, 2011)
Maryland Attorney General Douglas Gansler’s office announced a settlement agreement with the Sparrows Point steel mill for alleged violations of Maryland pollution laws. According to Gansler’s office, the violations occurred when a blast furnace caught fire after gases escaped due to a pressure surge and forced a raw material into release valves, which then ignited. The agreement between Gansler’s office, the Maryland Department of the Environment, and Sparrows Point requires the mill to pay a $135,000 penalty and prevent unnecessary openings of the pressure relief valves.
Kansas AG Defends Power Plant Permit (October 12, 2011)
Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt has filed a brief with the Kansas Supreme Court asking the court to uphold a permit to construct a power plant in the state. The Kansas Department of Health and Environment issued a permit allowing Sunflower Electric to build a coal power plant in the state and has since been sued by the Sierra Club. Schmidt’s office is defending the state and the Department in the suit. In a statement Schmidt said, “No law authorizes or requires KDHE to refuse to license an electric generating plant because its fuel source is coal.”
Texas AG says EPA Cross-State Pollution Rule Changes not Sufficient (October 6, 2011)
The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed changes to the Cross-State Air Pollution rule that the agency says will soften the rule. Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, who is suing the EPA over the rule, said the revisions were minor. The revisions include allocating additional allowances for emissions in a state trading program, most of which will go to Texas for sulfur dioxide emissions. Abbott says his office will continue their legal challenge against the Cross-State rule.
Massachusetts AG asks NRC to Review Nuclear Plant Safety (October 3, 2011)
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley has asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to withhold a 20 year operating permit to the Pilgrim Nuclear Station until the safety of the plant is confirmed. Coakley said that the radiation leak from the Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan, which shares the same basic design with the Pilgram facility, underscored the need for safety reviews of U.S. reactor pools. NRC has not indicated when it will make a decision on the future of the plant.
Delaware City must Disclose Solar Power Pricing (October 1, 2011)
Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden’s office ruled that the city of Dover, Delaware must disclose the price citizens are paying for power from a new solar installation. The decision came after Biden’s office received complaints that the city released a redacted version of the power contract that excluded per-hour price for power. Dover allegedly stated that releasing the price would damage the competitive standing of LS Power Group. The city says it is making an unredacted copy available and LS Power has decided not to contest Biden’s decision.
Massachusetts AG asks for Fisheries Enforcement Information (September 29, 2011)
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley is asking federal officials to release information on enforcement of fishing laws in Massachusetts. Fishermen in Massachusetts have complained that officers and attorneys who enforce federal fisheries laws have been abusive and fining excessively. Coakley asked the U.S. Department of Commerce for all documents relating to disciplinary actions taken by the DOC, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and National Marine Fisheries Service. The inquiry follows an order by the Commerce Secretary to return tens of thousands of dollars in fines to fishermen that were found to be excessive or unjust.
7-Eleven to pay $25K to Missouri for State Clean Air Violations (September 29, 2011)
A judge ordered the 7-Eleven corporation to pay $25,000 for violations of the Missouri Air Conservation Act following a lawsuit by Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster. According to Koster, nine 7-Eleven stores in Missouri were determined to be in violation of Missouri regulations requiring maintenance of gasoline vapor recovery systems. In a statement Koster said, “Missouri’s Air Conservation Law was enacted to protect both citizens’ health and our environment. The Attorney General’s Office will work to ensure these laws are followed and violations are corrected.” The judge also ordered 7-Eleven to pay all court costs.
Maryland AG Files First Charges Under Critical Area Law (September 28, 2011)
Maryland Attorney General Douglas Gansler announced six criminal charges against William Clark for violating the state’s Critical Area law—the first criminal charges to be filed under the law. According to Gansler, Clark is charged with illegally clearing trees in violation of critical area and buffer regulations. Gansler filed the charges after the matter was referred to his office.
Pennsylvania AG Charges Sewage Treatment Plant Worker (September 27, 2011)
Pennsylvania Attorney General Linda Kelly’s office filed charges against a sewage treatment plant employee for allegedly falsifying environmental reports to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. According to Kelly, the employee submitted false results to the state DEP in the Discharge Monitoring Report and in some instances failed to conduct tests or collect samples. The employee is charged with public records tampering, unsworn falsification to authorities, and unlawful conduct.
Florida AG Joins EPA Cross-State Pollution Rule Challenge (September 26, 2011)
Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that her office is joining Nebraska and five other states in a suit against the Environmental Protection Agency over the new Cross-State Air Pollution rule. The lawsuit alleges that any anticipated benefits of the rule are far outweighed by the costs of implementing it. In a press release Bondi said, “We will continue to protect Florida consumers and businesses from unnecessary and costly federal regulation.” The new rule is scheduled to take effect January 2012.
Texas AG Challenges EPA Toxic-Emissions Rule (September 22, 2011)
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott filed suit against the Environmental Protection Agency seeking to block a toxic-emissions rule from taking effect. According to Abbott’s petition, Texas was not given enough time to comment on the rules. Specifically, Texas alleges the state was not given a chance to comment on a new EPA model used to draft the rule. The challenged rule is the Cross-State Air Pollution rule, which is also being challenged by Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt.
Kansas AG Files Suit Against EPA Over Rulemaking (September 20, 2011)
Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt filed a lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency to prevent new air pollution regulations from taking effect. According to Schmidt, the new regulation will cost Kansas utilities hundreds of millions of dollars for new equipment by January 1, 2012. The EPA says the new “Cross-State Air Pollution rule” is meant to prevent air pollution from a source in one state from negatively impacting the air quality of other states. In a statement about the rule Schmidt said, “It will be physically impossible for all of our utilities to comply, which means that either Kansans will be paying higher rates to buy out-of-state electricity or there simply will not be enough electricity to meet Kansas demand after the first of the year.”
Vermont Attorney General Concludes Oral Arguments in Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant Case (September 15, 2011)
Oral arguments concluded in a lawsuit brought by Entergy Nuclear challenging Vermont’s denial of an extension of Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant’s operating license. Entergy brought the lawsuit maintaining that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s approval of the 20 year extension preempted Vermont. Vermont Attorney General, William Sorrell, defended the state’s decision not to renew the license arguing that Vermont had many reasons beyond safety factored into the decision. A decision is expect this fall. (Read More about the case here)
Wisconsin AG Gives Testimony on Asian Carp (September 14, 2011)
Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen gave testimony to the state Assembly Natural Resources Committee regarding Asian carp and the ongoing lawsuit against the Army Corps of Engineers. Van Hollen told the Committee the lawsuit by Wisconsin and four other states has made the federal government take the threat of Asian carp invasion seriously. While a federal court denied the states’ request for a preliminary injunction closing the connections between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River, Van Hollen pointed out the appeals court agreed the states proved Asian carp pose a likely threat to Great Lakes fisheries.
California AG Joins Community Lawsuit Over Pollution (September 8, 2011)
California Attorney General Kamala Harris has joined a lawsuit by Mira Loma Village against Riverside County over its approval of an industrial project in the area. Mira Loma residents sued the county after it approved a project for 1.4 million square feet of industrial buildings and warehouses that would cover 60 acres of land and add 1,500 diesel truck trips through the neighborhood. The lawsuit alleges that Riverside County did not adequately analyze or mitigate the health impacts to residents from the project. The Mira Loma community currently has diesel levels higher than state and federal air quality standards. In a statement about the suit Harris said, "All California residents could be put at risk if developments like this are pushed through by officials without appropriate and legally-mandated consideration of the environmental effects on health and welfare.”
California AG Reaches Agreement with Chevron (September 7, 2011)
California Attorney General Kamala Harris has reached a proposed settlement with Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Chevron Stations Inc. over allegations Chevron violated state hazardous materials and waste laws. Harris filed suit against Chevron last week, alleging the company tampered with or disabled leak detection devices on underground gasoline storage tanks, among other charges of improper maintenance of the storage tanks. The settlement requires Chevron to pay $24.5 million, as well as operate a statewide compliance program to train employees and track how the underground tanks are monitored. The settlement still needs to be approved by the court.
Missouri AG Sues Fitness Center Operators Over Drinking Water (September 7, 2011)
Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster filed suit against a Missouri couple operating the Class Act Family Fitness Center, alleging violations of state drinking water laws. According to Koster, Class Act’s owners violated the Missouri Safe Drinking Water Act by using an unapproved farm well as a public water supply. Koster’s allegations of drinking water violations include failure to obtain proper authorization to construct a “non-community water system,” obtain a permit for drinking water, and meet microbiological contamination level requirements. The violations came to the attention of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources after 30 people became ill following contact with the fitness center water, including 15 cases of E. coli infection. The suit asks the court to issue a preliminary injunction that requires the fitness center to comply with state law, construct a new public water system in compliance with state law, and to pay civil penalties and court costs.
Ohio AG Sues Housing Developer Over Pollution (September 4, 2011)
Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine filed suit against Clemens Development Co., a Miami Valley housing developer, over permit and pollution violations. According to DeWine’s office, Clemens failed to get necessary permits for construction activities. Additionally, DeWine’s office says storm water full of sediment from the construction site ran into the Little Sugar Creek. DeWine’s office further alleges Clemens ignored multiple notices between 2007 and 2010 regarding violations. The lawsuit asks the court for fines, to require the development to meet state code, and require future home owners be informed of the situation surrounding the development.
Smelter Agrees to Reduce Lead Emissions After Illinois AG Suit (September 3, 2011)
Following a lawsuit last week by Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan, smelter H. Kramer and Co. agreed to take action to reduce lead emissions from its plant in a preliminary injunction filed with the court. Madigan filed suit against the company over allegations from the state Environmental Protection Agency that the plant exceeded federal air quality emissions standards for lead in in 2010. The injunction requires the plant to immediately reduce emissions through such actions as updating pollution control technology and cleaning gravel contaminated with lead. According to Madigan’s office, the plant has already implemented some lead emission reduction techniques, including removing a smoke stack, repairing holes in the roof, and installing high-speed vertical doors on the buildings.
Vermont AG Moves to Dismiss Vermont Yankee Operator Lawsuit (September 1, 2011)
Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell’s office moved to dismiss a lawsuit by senior operators at the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant. Seven operators at Vermont Yankee filed the suit, alleging violations of civil liberties should Vermont Yankee closed due to the state’s unwillingness to grant a new certificate of public good. The lawsuit also alleges the state is preempted from taking action over Vermont Yankee under the Atomic Energy Act. In the lawsuit Sorrell’s office states, "Operators' due process claim is without merit because Operators do not have a constitutionally cognizable property interest in VY operating beyond March 21, 2012. Operators are asking this court to accept the radical notion that whenever someone obtains a federal license, that person becomes legally injured if anyone takes any action that interferes with the full use of that license." This lawsuit follows a separate lawsuit filed by Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, the current owner of Vermont Yankee, in April also alleging preemption under the Atomic Energy Act.
Great Lakes Attorneys General Call for Invasive Species Prevention (August 31, 2011)
Attorneys General from six states—Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin—called for a cooperative campaign to cut off the link between the Mississippi River and Great Lakes to prevent invasive species, such as Asian carp. The Attorneys General sent a letter to the Attorneys General in 27 other states asking them to join the campaign. Speaking about the invasive species issue Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette said, “We have Asian carp coming into Lake Michigan and zebra mussels moving out of the Great Lakes and into the heart of our country, both of which are like poison to the ecology of our waters. This is not just a Great Lakes issue. By working together, we hope to put pressure on the federal government to act before it's too late." Five of the Great Lakes states are suing the Army Corps of Engineers over a waterway network that creates an artificial link between Lake Michigan and a tributary of the Mississippi river.
Texas AG Looks to Prevent EPA Air Pollution Rule (August 26,2011)
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott’s office announced through a spokeswoman that it "will pursue every available legal remedy" to prevent the Environmental Protection Agency’s Cross-State Air Pollution Rule from being implemented in Texas. The new rule looks to reduce power plant air pollution, but Texas officials are concerned the rule will cause coal-based plants to shut down and cause an electricity shortage in the state. Abbott’s decision follows a request by the Texas Railroad Commission for Abbot’s office to take legal action concerning EPA’s new rule.
Vermont AG Opposes Motion to Bar Witnesses in Vermont Yankee Case (August 25, 2011)
As part of the ongoing litigation surrounding the Vermont Yankee nuclear facility, Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell filed a motion opposing an attempt by Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, the owners of the facility, to bar three of the state’s expert witnesses. Last week Entergy filed a motion in limine with the U.S District Court for the District of Vermont in Brattleboro asking the court to bar Peter Bradford, Bruce Hinkley, and William Steinhurst from testifying as expert witnesses. Sorrell argues that the witnesses are essential to the case and that Entergy is being hypocritical by attempting to prevent the testimony. According to Sorrell, the witnesses are necessary to testify about the preemptive scope of the Atomic Energy Act, as well as the Vermont General Assembly’s motives in passing some of the legislation at the heart of the lawsuit. Sorrell notes that his office was prompted to offer the expert testimony to dispute Entergy’s claims that Vermont legislators had improper motives in passing the legislation. Entergy asked the court to make a decision by August 26.
Delaware AG Announces Manufactured Housing Informational Workshops (August 23, 2011)
Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden’s office announced that it will conduct three informational workshops regarding manufactured homes across Delaware in August and September. Biden’s office says the meetings will cover issues including Delware’s law on manufactured homes, owner rights and responsibilities, septic systems, drinking water, procedures for filing complaints, and public safety. There will be one workshop in each of the three counties in the state and speakers will include staff from the Consumer Protection Unit of Biden’s office, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Office of Drinking Water, and Community Legal Aid Society.
Delaware AG Announces New Pollution Law (August 22, 2011)
Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden announced that the Delaware Governor signed a bill concerning “chronic” polluters into law. According to Biden, the new law allows state environmental regulators to designate polluters as “chronic violators.” Once an entity or person has been labeled a chronic violator, they are subject to stricter requirements in terms of reporting and permitting, as well as higher penalties. The new law would allow a maximum fine of $10,000 per illegal emission each day for chronic violators, rather than the usual maximum of $10,000 per day of violation.
Vermont AG Settles with Reebok Companies (August 19, 2011)
Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell’s office reached an agreement with two Reebook companies over allegations the companies failed to do proper groundwater testing at a manufacturing site. According to Sorrell’s office, pursuant to a 1996 agreement the companies were required to do quarterly groundwater testing at a hockey equipment manufacturing site near the Connecticut River. After hazardous chemicals were released at the site when Reebok-CCM Hockey Inc., then known as Maska U.S. Inc., the company was required to do groundwater testing quarterly. When Reebok purchased Maska they were obligated to continue groundwater testing, Sorrell’s office says. Under the terms of the settlement, the two companies must pay $40,000 in total to Vermont.
New York AG Subpoenas Energy Companies Regarding Natural Gas (August 18, 2011)
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman subpoenaed three energy companies—Range Resources, Cabot Oil and Gas, and Goodrich Petroleum—over questions of how the companies used federal rules governing how they report oil and gas reserves to investors. The subpoenas are part of an investigation by Schneiderman’s office into the accuracy of descriptions the companies gave to investors regarding prospects for natural gas wells. According to sources close to Schneiderman’s office, the subpoenas requested documents relating to discrepancies between what the companies told investors and what they reported to the federal government. Additionally, Schneiderman requested the companies submit information regarding the formulas they use to predict how long a gas well will remain productive.
Massachusetts Mobile Home Park Found Liable Over Septic System (August 15, 2011)
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley announced that the Pocasset Mobile Home Park was found liable for alleged violations of state environmental laws. According to Coakley, Pocasset’s owners have violated environmental laws and court orders that required the park to upgrade a failing septic system. The park experienced multiple sewage overflows from the septic system. Coakley says the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection issued Pocasset a permit requiring the septic system upgrade. In her announcement Coakley states, “As the owner of the property, it was Mr. Austin's responsibility to comply with the law and by refusing to do so, he created a significant risk to the health and safety of the families and individuals living there. This court order requires Mr. Austin to upgrade the parks septic system and to comply with the law to protect the health and safety of the park's residents."
California AG Reaches Diesel Emissions Settlement (August 15, 2011)
California Attorney General Kamala Harris announced a settlement with the cargo terminals of Long Beach and Los Angeles ports for diesel emission reduction. Harris sued the cargo terminals two months ago, alleging that residents were exposed to high levels of diesel emissions from the terminals in violation of Proposition 65. Under the terms of the settlement, the terminals will have to reduce diesel emissions through projects valued at $1 million per terminal, pay the ports for projects that lower diesel emissions from vehicles and machinery, and implement a warning program for the public.
Maryland AG Announces Fines Against Country Club for Pollution (August 11, 2011)
The owners of Horn’s Point, a Cambridge, Maryland country club, was ordered to pay $500,000 for alleged discharge of pollutants into wetlands, according to Maryland Attorney General Douglas Gansler. Gansler’s office alleges BSJ Partners LLC, the country club owners, discharged raw sewage into wetlands along the Choptank River, which flows into the Chesapeake Bay, after their septic system failed. According to Gansler, BSJ Partners did this for two years, saving more than $424,000. In a statement Gansler said, "The extraordinary penalty we secured in this case is a severe warning to anyone who would pollute our wetlands, our rivers and the Chesapeake Bay. This office will aggressively pursue and punish those who violate the law and harm the health and well-being of Maryland's precious natural resources." BSJ Partners must pay $485,000 for violating environmental laws, $15,000 for failing to submit discharge monitoring reports, and $500 for discovery violations.
New Mexico AG Sues Bureau of Reclamation Over Water (August 9, 2011)
New Mexico Attorney General Gary King filed a lawsuit against the Bureau of Reclamation regarding distribution of water. In the suit, King asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent the Bureau from releasing water originally classified for New Mexico to Texas instead. In July, the Bureau reclassified 65,000 acres of water in the Elephant Butte Reservoir, making it available to Texas when it was originally set aside for New Mexico. King alleges this unilateral action by the Bureau is illegal under the Rio Grande Compact because the water was stored for New Mexico’s benefit.
AGs Ask EPA to Withdraw Proposed Electricity Regulations (August 5, 2011)
Attorneys General from nine states—Arizona, Florida, Guam, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Utah—have asked Environmental Protection Agency administrator Lisa Jackson to withdraw proposed electricity regulations. The proposed regulations would require utilities to use Maximum Achievable Control Technology and EPA officials say the regulations are designed to improve air quality. The Attorneys General argue that the EPA failed to follow President Obama’s directive to analyze cumulative effects of new regulations before implementing them. Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt cites a cumulative effect study conducted by an unnamed private industry group that showed the new regulation, when combined with another EPA transportation rule, would raise Kansas electricity rates more than 12% by 2016. In a letter to Jackson, Schmidt asked the EPA to withdraw the proposed regulation until the cumulative impacts were analyzed.
Iowa AG Announces Civil Penalty in Cattle Pollution Case (August 5, 2011)
A Sioux County judge has ordered Haverhals Farm, a cattle company, to pay a $15,000 civil penalty for alleged manure discharge into an Iowa tributary. Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller and the Iowa Department of Natural Resources alleged Haverhals discharged approximately 950,000 gallons of cattle manure into a tributary. In response to Miller’s petition filed with the court, Haverhals admitted to discharging and land-applying cattle manure, which resulted in surface or groundwater pollution, in a consent decree. In Iowa, feedlot operations exceeding 1,000 livestock may not discharge manure into waterways without a permit. The judge also ordered Haverhals to comply with Iowa groundwater protection laws.
Massachusetts AG Reaches Settlement Over Superfund Site (August 4, 2011)
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley announced a $1 million settlement with two former owners and two current owners of a Superfund site in the state. The Blackburn & Union Privileges Superfund Site contains water and land contaminated with such hazardous substances as arsenic, asbestos, and lead. The former and current owners involved in the settlement must pay $1,094,169.56 to the state and federal natural resources trustees, Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, and Department of the Interior. The trustees will use the settlement for restoration projects to repair damages to wetlands, groundwater, and other ecological resources. Praising the settlement Coakley said, “The citizens of Walpole have had to live with the environmental impact of this contamination for many years. We are pleased that today's agreement will not only require the responsible parties to reimburse taxpayer dollars, but will also provide funding to begin restoring or replacing the wetland and other natural resources."
U.S. Government Looks to Dismiss New York AG’s “Fracking” Suit (August 4, 2011)
U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch requested a pre-motion conference ahead of the government’s planned motion to dismiss New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s lawsuit against the Army Corp of Engineers for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Schneiderman filed suit against the Army Corp on May 31, alleging it failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act when it refused to study the effects of hydrofracking on the Delaware River basin. Lynch argues Schneiderman’s claim is barred by a number of legal principles, including sovereign immunity, lack of standing, and that the claim is not ripe for review. Schneiderman’s suit argues that because the federal government is part of the Delaware River Basin Commission it must comply with NEPA and study the effects on the basin. The Army Corps contends that the Commission is not a federal agency.
Washington and South Carolina File Suit Against Nuclear Regulatory Commission (July 29, 2011)
Washington Attorney General Rob McKenna announced that Washington and South Carolina have filed a lawsuit against the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The lawsuit seeks to compel the NRC to resume consideration of a stalled nuclear waste dump project, Yucca Mountain, in Nevada. Washington and South Carolina argue that the NRC has unreasonably delayed the consideration of the Yucca Mountain license application after the Obama administration sought to withdraw the application. Explaining the decision to file McKenna says, “We filed today's action because the current situation is unacceptable. There's always a risk that, in the future, in searching for a solution, that it would be just fine to leave large amounts of waste at Hanford. That would be incredibly unfair, considering this state has carried a disproportionate share of the burden." This most recent lawsuit comes after a federal court threw out another lawsuit by Washington and South Carolina earlier this year, determining that the action was not appropriate because the NRC had not made a final decision on Yucca Mountain.
Vermont AG Warns Landlords for Lead Paint Violations (July 26, 2011)
Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell announced that his office sent out letters to 14 landlords regarding noncompliance with state lead laws. Vermont requires landlords of buildings existing before 1978 to repair peeling paint and clean common areas, among other annual maintenance endeavors. The letters are part of a larger statewide effort by the Vermont Attorney General’s office to reduce lead exposure in rental properties. The notified landlords have three months to bring the property into compliance.
Massachusetts AG Settles with Light Bulb Distributor (July 26, 2011)
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley announced a $7,000 settlement with fluorescent light bulb distributor Lumiram Electric Corporation. The settlement stems from allegations Lumiram used misleading environmental advertisement and violated the Mercury Management Act. In addition to the monetary settlement, Lumiram agreed to correct its advertising and comply with Massachusetts mercury waste management laws. In her announcement Coakley says, "While using compact fluorescent light bulbs can help conserve energy, it is important that they are recycled properly to protect our environment. Companies doing business in the state must comply with our environmental protection laws."
Vermont AG Announces Settlement for Lead Drinking Glasses Complaint (July 25, 2011)
Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell announced a $10,000 settlement with Vandor LLC, a Utah-based company that imported decorative drinking glasses. The complaints alleged that the imported glasses contained high levels of lead. The settlement also prevents Vandor from selling children’s products in the state unless they meet specific requirements regarding lead and cadmium content. Additionally, Vandor must report its test results and allow Vermont consumers to return the glasses at issue for a refund.
Maryland AG Announces “Fracking” Education Efforts (July 21, 2011)
Maryland Attorney General Douglas Gansler announced an information campaign designed to help protect Maryland landowners from “high-pressure sales tactics” by speculators looking for natural gas deposits. Western Maryland sits on a natural gas rich area known as the Marcellus Shale, making it attractive to companies drilling for natural gas through hydraulic fracturing, also known as “fracking.” Gansler states, "Fracking poses significant risks to the land and the groundwater beneath it. Every landowner needs to be armed with accurate knowledge of these risks in order to safeguard his or her legal rights when being asked to lease mineral rights." Gansler’s office has produced two documents intended to help landowners that are now available on the Maryland Attorney General’s webpage.
Federal Court Denies Motion for Injunction in Vermont Yankee Case (July 19, 2011)
The U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont denied a motion for preliminary injunction in the Entergy suit against the state of Vermont. Entergy, owner of the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant, is suing Vermont Governor Shumlin, Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell, and members of a state regulatory agency for a judgment ruling that state attempts to regulate the plant are preempted by federal law. The court determined Entergy would not suffer any irreparable harm that a preliminary injunction could address. Sorrell, representing Vermont, states, "We will continue to defend the constitutionality of Vermont's laws regulating Vermont Yankee and will be working hard to prepare for the critical merits stage of this litigation." The trial is scheduled to begin on September 12.
Connecticut Settles Suit with Covanta Power Plant (July 18, 2011)
The Connecticut Attorney General’s Office and the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection settled with Covanta Projects of Wallingford over alleged violations at a power plant. The suit alleged that Covanta’s dioxin levels at one unit of the power plant exceeded the maximum state allowance. Covanta agreed to pay $400,000 in penalties to the state, $200,000 of which will go to support environmental protection projects. Covanta may reopen the closed unit after meeting conditions mandated in the settlement agreement.
Iowa AG Announces Civil Penalties Assessed Against Pharmaceutical Company (July 14, 2011)
Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller announced that Sioux Pharm, a pharmaceutical company, has been assessed a $20,000 civil penalty by a district court judge for wastewater violations. Miller sued Sioux Pharm in 2009, alleging a number of wastewater violations, including illegal discharge of wastewater into groundwater. Sioux Pharm is further ordered to permanently close their wastewater storage facility and level it.
Vermont AG Announces No Charges Against Nuclear Power Plant Executives (July 6, 2011)
Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell announced today that no charges will be brought against Entergy Corp. officials for lying to regulators regarding the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant. The investigation examined statements by executives that there were no underground pipes at the Vermont Yankee site that could be leaking radioactive material. Entergy officials later admitted that there were in fact underground pipes at the facility that were leaking radioactive substances. The officials stated that they had mislead regulators but not intentionally. Sorrell determined that while it was clear the executives had “repeatedly failed to meet a minimally acceptable standard of credibility and trustworthiness,” there was insufficient evidence to support criminal charges.
Missouri AG Sues Man over Air Conservation Laws Violations (June 24, 2011)
Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster has filed a lawsuit against Scott Porter for allegedly burning trade, construction, demolition, and salvage wastes without a permit. Attorney General Koster has sought a permanent injunction that would require Porter to comply with the Missouri Air Conservation Law, and to pay civil penalties. This lawsuit is one of many Attorney General Koster has filed against Missouri residents for violations of Missouri’s conservation laws this year.
Massachusetts AG Sides with Vermont over Nuclear Plant Case (June 14, 2011)
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley has filed a brief supporting Vermont’s position on whether the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant should close. The plant’s owner, Entergy Corporation, sued the state after state officials indicated it was unlikely Vermont would renew the plant’s federal license, despite the fact that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved the renewal. State officials in both Vermont and Massachusetts are concerned about the potential for harm in the event of a disaster, and are also interested in ensuring that states are able to regulate their power generating facilities. The state plans to close the Vernon plant on March 21, 2012, if Entergy is unable to secure a judgment preventing the shutdown.
New York Attorney General Vows to Sue Federal Government Over Fracking Safety (April 18, 2011)
New York Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman, stated Monday that he will sue the Federal Government if it fails to commit to an environmental review of natural gas drilling in the Delaware River Basin within 30 days. The review would include an examination of hydraulic fracturing which Schneiderman says poses risks to the environment, health, and communities.